(Political Theory 36/1):
P’s threat subjects Q to coercion only if
But P’s threat actually coerces Q’s (in)action only if two further conditions are met as well:
- P communicates to Q his intention to cause outcome X if Q undertakes action A.
- Q believes that X ∩ A is worse for her than (⌐X) ∩ (⌐A),’ such that X provides Q a reason not to do A.
- P’s reason for threatening X is his belief that X provides Q a reason not to do A.
- Q believes that P has the capacity to cause X and intends to do so if Q does A.
- Q does not do A.
- Part of Q’s reason for not doing A is to avoid X.
No comments:
Post a Comment